Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ron Hogan's avatar

“I was called to love them and continually point back to God. I was called to be the person who said over and over again- through all the different seasons of our common life that God is always with us, even when God is not obvious, and that God always- always loves us.”

I’m a Quaker, so we don’t have priests—and the “liberal” branch of the Religious Society of Friends I’m in doesn’t even have formal pastors—but we do believe in the calling to ministry, and this is as concisely wonderful a description of ministry’s core as I’ve seen in a good long while.

Expand full comment
Matthew Lawrence's avatar

Once again, Kerlin: poignant, compelling, thoughtful. Thank you. As I consider the priesthood now from the perspective of retirement, I feel it’s time to be honest about what the priesthood is. The priesthood is a shared agreement between a person and a community in which the community says, “We find you to be a more-or-less trustworthy canvas for our sacred/spiritual/religious projections,” and the person says, “I am willing to be the canvas for your projections in exchange for certain privileges.” Of course, every community of every kind of faith persuasion has this kind of agreement, not limited to Episcopalians or Christians. As long as you are willing to enter into such an arrangement with a community that sees you as reflective of their deepest truths and values, you are likely to find such an arrangement again. Now that you are freed from the constraints of an archaic and largely problematic and obsolete symbol system, you are perfectly free to invent, reinvent, appropriate or steal whatever rituals and symbols best reflect the truths and values that you and your community genuinely share and believe in. Rosemary, oil, wine and fresh bread are all available to you, along with every other element suggestive of the sacred in your community (I dunno: nakedness? eye contact? hugs? So many good life giving and healing possible sacraments come to mind). You will be a priest again if and when you choose to enter into that bargain again.

As for me, I’m glad I was able to honor the stifling and also mostly loving arrangement as long as I did, but the toll that arrangement took on me was very real and deeply wounding, and I don’t know if I’d ever submit to it again. The wounds do not invalidate the grace and blessings that came with the role, but they do give me pause. I honestly don’t think, at this time in late stage middle class American capitalism, I would seek that role again. Mostly because every single community that enters into that arrangement is prone to elevating, then crucifying, those they choose. I’m done with that kind of relationship. On the other hand, I am happy to freely express my love and joy with everyone I encounter, including a community of crusty old pool players, and to the extent that that inspires people to tell me their secrets and find healing in our encounters, I am happy to play my part. I am also free to set my own boundaries around those relationships - always a battle in the priesthood because my life, by contract, was not my own. I have no time for such nonsense now.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts